<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDP Variations 2007-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/2009/10/gdp-variances-2007-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/2009/10/gdp-variances-2007-2009/</link>
	<description>The Return Of The Great Depression</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: voxday</title>
		<link>http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/2009/10/gdp-variances-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>voxday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/?p=9901#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re absolutely right, the spreadsheet was missing the negative sign.  I should have checked the book, it&#039;s correct in Table 4.1 on page 60.  I&#039;ll correct the chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re absolutely right, the spreadsheet was missing the negative sign.  I should have checked the book, it&#8217;s correct in Table 4.1 on page 60.  I&#8217;ll correct the chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drifter</title>
		<link>http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/2009/10/gdp-variances-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Drifter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/?p=9901#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I believe your graph may have errors in it.

Q3 2008 Revised is roughly +3%, while this page (http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm) says Q3 2008 GDP: -2.7%. It appears that you forgot the negative.

Also (and more seriously), Q4 2008 Advance is roughly +4%, while this page (http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm) says implies -3.8%. Again it is missing the negative.

I should declare that I haven&#039;t checked all the figures, just the ones that looked &quot;out of whack&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe your graph may have errors in it.</p>
<p>Q3 2008 Revised is roughly +3%, while this page (<a href="http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm" rel="nofollow">http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm</a>) says Q3 2008 GDP: -2.7%. It appears that you forgot the negative.</p>
<p>Also (and more seriously), Q4 2008 Advance is roughly +4%, while this page (<a href="http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm" rel="nofollow">http://useconomy.about.com/od/economicindicators/a/GDP-statistics.htm</a>) says implies -3.8%. Again it is missing the negative.</p>
<p>I should declare that I haven&#8217;t checked all the figures, just the ones that looked &#8220;out of whack&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Return Of The Great Depression &#8220;Recession unofficially ends&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/2009/10/gdp-variances-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>The Return Of The Great Depression &#8220;Recession unofficially ends&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://admin.returnofthegreatdepression.com/?p=9901#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] growth, which was revised downward to -6.2 percent growth in the subsequent preliminary report. See GDP Variations 2007-2009 for a graphical demonstration of the reliability of GDP reporting. While there are some genuinely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] growth, which was revised downward to -6.2 percent growth in the subsequent preliminary report. See GDP Variations 2007-2009 for a graphical demonstration of the reliability of GDP reporting. While there are some genuinely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
